Skip to main content

The Problem With Disraeli's Angles:The Platypus Reads Part LXXVIII

British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once claimed that he was on the side of the angels to which G.K. Chesterton quipped: "on the side of the fallen angels, and all the imperialisms of the princes of the abyss."  Beyond simply disagreeing with Disraeli's policies, Chesterton was reacting to a common sort of gnosticism popular in the Victorian era that equated anything "spiritual" with the Good.  The problem with such an attitude is that it ignores the possibility of spiritual evil.  It wants angels but ignores demons.

Mike Mignola's occult-saturated world makes no bones about the existence of spiritual evil, but it often raises the very real problem of how to fight it.  Jesus' challenge to the pharisees with the principle that "Satan cannot cast our Satan" isn't a given for many of Mignola's protagonists.  This poses a very real problem in that if means don't matter, is it only the ends that separate Good from Evil?  What is the basis for the moral "up" and "down" in Mignola's universe?

For some time, Mignola has been playing his cards close to his chest.  However, as Hellboy's destiny accelerates with the events of "The Wild Hunt," we seem to be getting a few hints.  These hints have become stronger with the release of "Witchfinder: In the Service of Angles."  "Witchfinder" is a "Hellboy" spin-off with Victorian occult detective Sir Edward Grey as its focal character.  We know Sir Edward's fate from the "Hellboy" series, but now Mignola gives us the opportunity to see how he got there.  Without recapitulating the plot, much of the ethical drama in the work centers around the temptation for Sir Edward to fight evil with its own methods, or at the very least by stepping into gray areas (pun intended).  The warning signs already seem clear; those who use evil to fight evil pay the price in the end, and Sir Edward is danger unless he can learn this lesson.  That this is the central question for Sir Edward as a character can be seen in Hecate's words to him at the end of "Darkness Calls," that he will learn to do evil to do good and so become a traitor.

Though there's still two more novels of "Witchfinder" and an unknown number for "Hellboy" left to go, it seems like Mignola's moral universe is crystallizing; not dualist, but somewhere within the broadly Judeo-Christian tradition; perhaps somewhere in the neighborhood of Underhill and Williams. There are still a lot of twists and turns ahead though, so this analysis is merely provisional.  One thing is certain: wherever Mignola is taking us, it's one hell of a ride!

Comments

Joi said…
Glad to see you read Witchfinder! I think it's a great addition to the Hellboy universe: it seems like Edward ends up in some of the BPRD books as well, but I've only read 2 1/2 of those so far.
Anonymous said…
I am loving your ruminations about Mignola's works. I find his religious views enigmatic as well. He is certainly sympathetic to Christianity(unlike say, 99% of contemporary comic book authors) but there is more there than meets the eye.

Are you planning on reading "Baltimore"? You should. After reading the first two volumes I'm inclined to say Mignola is an agnostic much like Del Toro.
James said…
Greenbean,

I think you're probably on target. Mignola's handling of the supernatural reminds me of J. Michael Strazinsky (Midnight Nation, Babylon 5) and Guillermo Del Toro who are both agnostics with strong Catholic backgrounds. Even if I don't always agree with them, I find their openness refreshing.

Thanks for the tip about "Baltimore." I've been wanting to read that and just haven't gotten around to it yet. When I do, I'll post my thoughts.

Popular posts from this blog

The Platypus Reads Part XXVII

Thoughts after reading the "Iliad" to prepare a Greece unit for my students: -Hector is a jerk until he's dead. He even advocates the exposure of Achaean corpses and then has the cheek to turn around and ask Achilles to spare his. He rudely ignores Polydamas' prophecies and fights outside the gate to save his pride knowing full well what it will cost his family and city. After he's dead, he becomes a martyr for the cause. -Agamemnon has several moments of true leadership to balance out his pettiness. In this way, he's a haunting foil to Achilles: the two men are more alike than they want to acknowledge. -We see that Achilles is the better man at the funeral games of Patroclos. His lordliness, tact, and generosity there give us a window into Achilles before his fight with Agamemnon and the death of Patroclos consumed him. -Nestor is a boring, rambling, old man who's better days are far behind him, and yet every Achaean treats him with the upmo...

Seeing Beowulf Through Tolkien: The Platypus Reads Part CXCIX

After spending a few weeks wrestling with Tolkien's interpretation of Beowulf , I found myself sitting down and reading Seamus Heaney's translation of the text during a spare moment.  I came to the place where Beowulf presents Hrothgar with the hilt of the ancient sword that slew Grendel's mother.  Hrothgar looks down at the hilt with its ancient runes and carvings depicting the war between the giants and God and meditates on the fortunes of men.  In a flash of insight, I thought: this is the whole poem! Let me explain.  Tolkien believed that the genuine contribution of the Northern peoples to European culture was the theory of courage.  The Northern heroes, at their best, were men who fought for order against chaos -a battle they knew they were doomed to lose.  If they were true heroes, their souls would join the gods and aid them in the final battle against darkness and its monsters and again go down fighting, spitting in the face of the meaninglessness...

The Platypus and Theological Localism

My wife and I were listening the other day to Dr. Fred Sanders give a paper of California Theological Localism.  It was one of the more technical pieces we've heard from him, and it was fun to stretch our brains a little.  If I understand it right, the main idea of Theological Localism is that place matters and will shape the theology of its inhabitants in certain ways.  This could be seen as determinative, or merely as fodder for apologetic engagement, both of which Sanders rejects as insufficient or problematic.  What exactly is wanted seems to be a theological engagement with place, specifically California, in a way that Sanders and company feel has been neglected.  If that's not clear, the fault is mine as a listener or a writer. Of course, the idea of a theology of place caught my attention and my immediate response was "someone should do this for New England."  New England, after all, is its own peculiar place with, by American standards, a long, va...