Skip to main content

8-Bit Imagination: Platypus Nostalgia

Evidently there are a series of concept drawings created by Katsuya Terada for the first few Legend of Zelda games that have been floating around the internet (for how long before I discovered them I'm not sure).  I have to echo what I hear wherever these pictures turn up: this is the game as I imagined it when I was a kid.  There's something haunting and spacious about Katsuya Terada's images that captures all the feelings of mystery and adventure that came with playing a Zelda game.  The art that was actually released with the booklets for the games is far more "cartoony" and "safe."  Of course, the original games were made with children in mind and it makes sense that the marketing team would prefer brighter and more cartoon-like images.  What interests me, however, is that if these pictures were in fact used as concept art for the games why was there one set of visuals (a much more mature and visually arresting set) for the programers and a very different set for the consumers.  Perhaps it just comes down to a matter of different artists working for different departments that don't talk to each other.  Whatever the case may be, I'm sure there are enough people like me out there for it to be worth Nintendo's while to put out a Zelda game that brings Katsuya Terada's version of Hyrule to life.

...or would that ruin it?  The monster that is seen is never as scary as the monster that is unseen.  The book is always better in the movie.  There's something about the power of the imagination that always eludes our powers of creation in space and time.  Katsuya Terada's drawings are snapshots that provoke the imagination, not replace it.  The genius of the images seems to be as much in their starkness as in their detail: as much in what they don't show as what they show.  Would we be as impressed if we knew what was around the corner?  Would the monster be as monstrous if we could see it clearly?  Maybe the great thing about the early Zelda games was that the low level of technology required so much from the gamer's imagination.  They were mere sketches; you had to fill in the rest.  There was room for the imagination to run riot.  I don't know.  For old gamers, the question of nostalgia has to be raised: how much of this is just pining for an idealized and simpler time?

None of these questions are very profound, but as the first generation of gamers reaches maturity, it makes sense that we'd want to look back and reflect upon these unique pastimes.  Have we learned anything from them?  Are we any better off for having had them?  Is there anything here that has relevance for our lives today?  Can we make them better?  What should we pass on to younger gamers?  I guess that's the real point of this post; the real point of this series of posts.  Now that I'm old enough to reflect, what have I learned upon reflection? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Platypus Reads Part XXVII

Thoughts after reading the "Iliad" to prepare a Greece unit for my students: -Hector is a jerk until he's dead. He even advocates the exposure of Achaean corpses and then has the cheek to turn around and ask Achilles to spare his. He rudely ignores Polydamas' prophecies and fights outside the gate to save his pride knowing full well what it will cost his family and city. After he's dead, he becomes a martyr for the cause. -Agamemnon has several moments of true leadership to balance out his pettiness. In this way, he's a haunting foil to Achilles: the two men are more alike than they want to acknowledge. -We see that Achilles is the better man at the funeral games of Patroclos. His lordliness, tact, and generosity there give us a window into Achilles before his fight with Agamemnon and the death of Patroclos consumed him. -Nestor is a boring, rambling, old man who's better days are far behind him, and yet every Achaean treats him with the upmo...

California's Gods: Strange Platypus(es)

We've noticed lately a strange Californian dialectical twist: there, freeways take the definite article.  In other parts of the country one speaks of I 91 or 45 North.  In California, there's The 5, The 405, The 10.  Each of these freeways has its own quirks, a personality of sorts.  They aren't just stretches of pavement but presences, creatures that necessitate the definite article by their very individuality and uniqueness.  They are the angry gods to be worked, placated, feared, for without them life in California as we know it would cease.  Perhaps that's fitting for a land whose cities are named for saints and angels.  Mary may preside over the new pueblo of our lady of the angels, but the freeways slither like gigantic serpents through the waste places, malevolent spirits not yet trampled under foot.

Seeing Beowulf Through Tolkien: The Platypus Reads Part CXCIX

After spending a few weeks wrestling with Tolkien's interpretation of Beowulf , I found myself sitting down and reading Seamus Heaney's translation of the text during a spare moment.  I came to the place where Beowulf presents Hrothgar with the hilt of the ancient sword that slew Grendel's mother.  Hrothgar looks down at the hilt with its ancient runes and carvings depicting the war between the giants and God and meditates on the fortunes of men.  In a flash of insight, I thought: this is the whole poem! Let me explain.  Tolkien believed that the genuine contribution of the Northern peoples to European culture was the theory of courage.  The Northern heroes, at their best, were men who fought for order against chaos -a battle they knew they were doomed to lose.  If they were true heroes, their souls would join the gods and aid them in the final battle against darkness and its monsters and again go down fighting, spitting in the face of the meaninglessness...