Skip to main content

Looking at Types of Secondary Sources: The Platypus Reads Part CLXIV

Chugging along in my efforts to keep up wit my degree (M.A. History), I've been working my way through a pile of books on Ancient Greece for over a year now.  Some of them are old favorites (Francois Hartog's Memories of Odysseus, The Cambridge Companion to Homer), some have been new works by favorite authors (Robin Lane Fox's Travelling Heroes in the Epic Age of Homer), and some have been completely new (Vassos Karageorghis' Early Cyprus).  Then there's also that matter of learning to read Greek (we'll see how that goes).  Anyhow, all this study has opened my eyes to things I ought to have picked up earlier, or that maybe I had but was too busy to put into words.  Very few people are born researchers.   It usually takes decades to produce a real historian, and there's no reason to suppose that I'm any different.  In fact, the one admonition I received at Oxford that always stuck with me was "you need to take more time to think."  So here's me thinking.

I've realized (probably a day late and a dollar short) that secondary sources, at least in the field of history, can be broken down into several categories:

1. Books About Books: These are works that seek to grapple with the primary sources (those writers writing closest to the event).  In general, these works seek to extrapolate and organize information (both that which the author intended and that which he (or rarely, she) left unwittingly) and bring it to bear either on a historical question or on the question of how we ought to read the given text.  For examples see: The Cambridge Companion to Homer.

2. Books About Cultures, People, and Events: While these books will make use of primary sources, their goal is broader than the work of any one ancient author.  These are the books we generally think of when we think "History."  Drawing from many different sources, and often relying heavily on archeology, they seek to tell us what past peoples, places, battles, etc. might have been like (the past as it essentially was, not as it actually was) or to grapple with issues raised by said reconstructions.  For examples see: Early Greece by Oswyn Murray, or Salamis by Barry Strauss.

3. Books About Systems and Mentalities: Some works in the field of history aren't about any one particular person, battle, or culture, but are focused on a particular issue raised by the study of several different people, places, or cultures.  These works often bring to bear the fruits of sociological, linguistic, and psychological studies to examine broader questions about the past.  Often, they seek to reconstruct the mental world of a culture, or a group of cultures.  They may seek to refine or correct work done by books in categories 1 and 2 (and thus I've given them their own number though we might elide them with 2).  For examples see: Memories of Odysseus by Francois Hartog, or Traveling Heroes in the Epic Age of Homer by Robin Lane Fox. 

4. Books About the Field of History: Books in this category focus on theory and method.  They aren't focused on what happened in the past so much as how we are or ought to be going about our study of the past.  Sometimes, these books are written for the instruction of new initiates into the field.  Other times, they are written in response to some scholarly controversy or to advocate a new method or model.  For examples see: Who Killed Homer? by Victor Davis Hanson, or Decoding Ancient History by Thomas and Wick.  

Generally, in a course of study 2 should proceed 3.  4 and 1 can go together quite nicely as well as 1 and 3 (see Peter Hunt's Slaves, Warfare, and Ideology). Often, I think, 2 should proceed 1, and 1 should only be attempted after reading the primary source in question.  Of course, I'm always going to push for the primacy of the primary sources, but I will confess that reading a type 2 book before plunging in to the primary sources can enrich your understanding of them and make the journey more fruitful by supplying a little context for what's seen along the way. 

Well that's what I have so far.  Let me know if you think I ought to add another category or abolish one for simplicity's sake, etc.     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Platypus Reads Part XXVII

Thoughts after reading the "Iliad" to prepare a Greece unit for my students: -Hector is a jerk until he's dead. He even advocates the exposure of Achaean corpses and then has the cheek to turn around and ask Achilles to spare his. He rudely ignores Polydamas' prophecies and fights outside the gate to save his pride knowing full well what it will cost his family and city. After he's dead, he becomes a martyr for the cause. -Agamemnon has several moments of true leadership to balance out his pettiness. In this way, he's a haunting foil to Achilles: the two men are more alike than they want to acknowledge. -We see that Achilles is the better man at the funeral games of Patroclos. His lordliness, tact, and generosity there give us a window into Achilles before his fight with Agamemnon and the death of Patroclos consumed him. -Nestor is a boring, rambling, old man who's better days are far behind him, and yet every Achaean treats him with the upmo...

SNES as Money Well Spent: Platypus Nostalgia

I got my Super Nintendo Entertainment System when I was eleven years old.  That's a couple years after it first came out.  The occasion was a little dramatic: to celebrate the end of a two-and-a-half year course of treatment for cancer.  I had no idea that it would be waiting for me at home after the final doctors visit.  It was a nice spring day, the trees were waving gently in the breeze outside the bay windows.  With a cup of tea resting on the coffee table, I set down to play.  What was that first game?  It was The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past .  Around twenty years later, my SNES still works as does that Zelda cartridge.  It's been a long way from boyhood in Southern Connecticut to manhood in North Houston, but I'm still playing. Why am I still playing?  There were stretches when I didn't.  Many times, I've just been too busy.  There were also seasons when it felt embarrassing to still be playing video games....

Under the Moon: The Platypus Reads Part LXVI

My wife and I were discussing our favorite books from the Chronicles of Narnia on our way back from lunch.  My wife, true to her sunny personality, is a staunch fan of "The Voyage of the Dawntreader."  I can't argue with that choice but, when push comes to shove, "The Silver Chair" has always been my favorite. I have a bit of a theory.  I think "The Voyage of the Dawntreader" is Lewis' grail legend.  If that's so, then I'd hazard a guess and say that "The Silver Chair" is his "Pilgrim's Progress." -just think about the shape of Puddleglum's hat and the fact that he lives in the Fen Country and you'll see what got me thinking down this line. That brings me to why I like "The Silver Chair" so much.  When I was little, we had a children's version of "Pilgrim's Progress" that my mom used to read to me.  I lived in New England and the Christianity I was raised with had a heavy tin...