Skip to main content

Between Vivian and Enid: The Platypus Reads Part LVIII




On this trip through Tennyson's "Idylls of the King," as with "Jane Eyre," the symbolic/allegorical level of the work is standing out. With Tolkien, I tend to dislike formal allegory but often find myself attracted to layers of carefully created symbolism. Indeed, I find this to be the main draw of authors like Hawthorne. In my own writing, I find that symbols and images tend to take over the work, if I'm not careful, and drown out plot and characterization. Perhaps Tennyson's heavy use of symbols in "The Idylls of the King" is one of the things that draws me so strongly to the book.

I can't claim any particular genius in decoding Tennyson's symbols. Dorothy L. Sayers' writings got me pointed in the right direction by mentioning that Arthur stands for human reason and Guinevere for human emotion. The theme of the cycle is "sense at war with soul," and so Arthur and Guinevere's inability to reconcile and rule forms the central motif of the the book. Keeping that in mind, other sets of symbolic pairs appear: Gareth/merit and Lynette/praise Geraint/inconstancy and Enid/constancy, Balin/animal self and Balan/rational self, Merlin/wisdom and Vivian/cunning, Lancelot/incontinence and Elaine/will, Galahad/spiritual man and Gawain/carnal man, Pelleas/innocence and Ettaire/worldliness, Tristram/cynicism and Dagonet/idealism. These pairings drive both the action and meaning of the book.

Other symbols worth looking at include music/divine order, the three queens/ Faith, Hope, and Love, the Lady of the Lake/the Christian tradition, water/death, Sir Bors/moderation, the seasons/change.

That's all for the moment, but it's a deep work and I'm sure there will be more to come.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Platypus Reads Part XXVII

Thoughts after reading the "Iliad" to prepare a Greece unit for my students: -Hector is a jerk until he's dead. He even advocates the exposure of Achaean corpses and then has the cheek to turn around and ask Achilles to spare his. He rudely ignores Polydamas' prophecies and fights outside the gate to save his pride knowing full well what it will cost his family and city. After he's dead, he becomes a martyr for the cause. -Agamemnon has several moments of true leadership to balance out his pettiness. In this way, he's a haunting foil to Achilles: the two men are more alike than they want to acknowledge. -We see that Achilles is the better man at the funeral games of Patroclos. His lordliness, tact, and generosity there give us a window into Achilles before his fight with Agamemnon and the death of Patroclos consumed him. -Nestor is a boring, rambling, old man who's better days are far behind him, and yet every Achaean treats him with the upmo...
15 comments
Read more

Seeing Beowulf Through Tolkien: The Platypus Reads Part CXCIX

After spending a few weeks wrestling with Tolkien's interpretation of Beowulf , I found myself sitting down and reading Seamus Heaney's translation of the text during a spare moment.  I came to the place where Beowulf presents Hrothgar with the hilt of the ancient sword that slew Grendel's mother.  Hrothgar looks down at the hilt with its ancient runes and carvings depicting the war between the giants and God and meditates on the fortunes of men.  In a flash of insight, I thought: this is the whole poem! Let me explain.  Tolkien believed that the genuine contribution of the Northern peoples to European culture was the theory of courage.  The Northern heroes, at their best, were men who fought for order against chaos -a battle they knew they were doomed to lose.  If they were true heroes, their souls would join the gods and aid them in the final battle against darkness and its monsters and again go down fighting, spitting in the face of the meaninglessness...
3 comments
Read more

The Platypus and Theological Localism

My wife and I were listening the other day to Dr. Fred Sanders give a paper of California Theological Localism.  It was one of the more technical pieces we've heard from him, and it was fun to stretch our brains a little.  If I understand it right, the main idea of Theological Localism is that place matters and will shape the theology of its inhabitants in certain ways.  This could be seen as determinative, or merely as fodder for apologetic engagement, both of which Sanders rejects as insufficient or problematic.  What exactly is wanted seems to be a theological engagement with place, specifically California, in a way that Sanders and company feel has been neglected.  If that's not clear, the fault is mine as a listener or a writer. Of course, the idea of a theology of place caught my attention and my immediate response was "someone should do this for New England."  New England, after all, is its own peculiar place with, by American standards, a long, va...
6 comments
Read more